All Spammers Should Rot in Hell

Since January 16, 2006, over 3,000 attempts to post comment spam to this site have been logged. That’s 1,000 spam comments since February 6, 2006.

Speaking of spam, some of these worthless sacks of shit are using a script to load up my guestbook with spam. Fortunately, it was easy to filter out these attempts at posting spam to guesbook (spammers are persistent , but exceedingly dim).

Flying Spaghetti Monsterism

(from the Touched by His Noodly Appendage dept.)

(via Tina’s Shark Tank)

Touched by His Noodly Appendage

I never gave the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster much thought until I spent some time perusing the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster web site.

WHY YOU SHOULD CONVERT TO FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTERISM

  • Flimsy moral standards.
  • Every friday is a relgious holiday. If your work/school objects to that, demand your religious beliefs are respected and threaten to call the ACLU.
  • Our heaven is WAY better. We’ve got a Stripper Factory AND a Beer Volcano.

Looks good to me! 🙂

Friday Random Ten: 2006-02-17


NameArtistAlbumGenre
1. Catholic GirlsFrank ZappaJoe’s Garage (Disc 1)Alternative & Punk
2. The ProphecyHoward ShoreThe Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The RingSoundtrack
3. TongueR.E.M.MonsterRock
4. BreathlessThe CorrsVH1 Presents the Corrs Live in DublinFolk
5. Finest WorksongR.E.M.DocumentAlternative & Punk
6. Rhymin’ ManFrank ZappaBroadway The Hard WayAlternative & Punk
7. They Don’t Want MeWall Of VoodooCall Of The WestAlternative & Punk
8. Spanish Fantasy, Part IIIChick CoreaMy Spanish HeartJazz
9. ChaunceyVinnie ColaiutaVinnie ColaiutaJazz
10. Silk PyjamasThomas DolbyAstronauts & HereticsAlternative & Punk

Emoticons

Stolen from Dave Barry in Cyberspace:

:)		Happy person
:(		Sad person
:-)		Happy person with a nose
:-(		Sad person with a nose
:--(		Person who is sad because he or she has a large nose
:-D		Person laughing
:-D*		Person laughing so hard that he or she does not notice
		that a 5-legged spider is hanging from his or her lip
:-|		Person unsure of which long-distance company to choose
>8-O-(&)	Person just realizing that he or she has a tapeworm
;-)		Person winking
.-)		Person who can still smile despite losing an eyeball
:-OWW		Person vomiting a series of Slim Jims
:-Q		Person who just had cybersex and is now enjoying a
		postcoital cybercigarette
>:-Q -...	Person who was enjoying a postcoital cigarette until he
		suddenly noticed, to his alarm, that there is some kind of
		discharge dribbling from his cybermember
:-{ 8		Person who is unhappy with the results of her
		breast-enlargement surgery
:V:-|		Person who cannot figure out why nobody wants to talk to
		him or her, little suspecting that there is an alligator on his or
		her head
~oE]:-|		Fisherperson heading for market with a basket on his or
		her head containing a three-legged octopus that is giving off
		smell rays.
>:-[ -{9        Person who is none too pleased to be giving birth
                to a squirrel

Faux News wins battle for Deadeye Dick interview

Fox News wins battle for Cheney interview:

Fox News scored a significant get with the first post-accident interview with Cheney. Because it was the only interview Cheney planned to do on the subject, correspondent Brit Hume said on air Wednesday afternoon: “I felt some obligation to ask as many of the questions as … others would want to ask.”

Was there any doubt Fox News would get this interview? It’s not like Cheney was going to grant, say, Keith Olbermann this interview.

Deadeye Dick

Cheney accidentally shoots hunting companion:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally wounded a companion with shotgun pellets on a weekend quail hunt in Texas, his office said on Sunday.

Cheney’s companion, Harry Whittington, 78, was listed in stable condition after being brought in on Saturday night, said Yvonne Wheeler, a spokeswoman for the Christus Spohn Hospital in Corpus Christi, Texas.

Cheney’s office said Whittington, an Austin lawyer, had been sprayed by birdshot while hunting at the Armstrong Ranch in south Texas.

Alternate headline: Drunk with power, Dick Cheney decides to act out The Most Dangerous Game.

But seriously (updated 2006-02-13):

Friday Random Ten: 2006-02-10


NameArtistAlbumGenre
1. Sex FarmSpinal TapThis is Spinal TapSoundtrack
2. Snoopy’s Search/Red BaronBilly CobhamSpectrumJazz
3. Meeting Of The Spirits Mahavishnu OrchestraInner Mounting FlameJazz
4. DreamsThe CranberriesEverybody Else Is Doing It, So Why Can’t We?Alternative & Punk
5. Symphony #4 In G – 4. Sehr BehaglichChristoph von Dohnányi; Cleveland OrchestraGustav Mahler: Symphony No. 4Classical
6. Down the Coast HwyStan RidgwayBlack DiamondAlternative & Punk
7. Cletus Awreetus-AwrightusFrank ZappaThe Grand WazooAlternative & Punk
8. In Your EyesPeter GabrielSoRock
9. Real LoveYesTalkRock
10. The Three Of MeAlan ParsonsTry Anything OnceRock

One of Life’s Unanswered Questions gets Answered

You can swim just as fast in a pool of gloop.:

It’s a question that has taxed generations of the finest minds in physics: do humans swim slower in syrup than in water? And since you ask, the answer’s no. Scientists have filled a swimming pool with a syrupy mixture and proved it.

And some people think science is dull!

“What appealed was the bizarreness of the idea,” says Edward Cussler of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, who led the experiment. It’s a question that also fascinated his student Brian Gettelfinger, a competitive swimmer who narrowly missed out on a place at this summer’s Olympic Games in Athens.

Cussler and Gettelfinger took more than 300 kilograms of guar gum, an edible thickening agent found in salad dressings, ice cream and shampoo, and dumped it into a 25-metre swimming pool, creating a gloopy liquid twice as thick as water. “It looked like snot,” says Cussler.

The pair then asked 16 volunteers, a mix of both competitive and recreational swimmers, to swim in a regular pool and in the guar syrup. Whatever strokes they used, the swimmers’ times differed by no more than 4%, with neither water nor syrup producing consistently faster times, the researchers report in the American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal1.

But while it might sound like a trivial question, the principle is actually fundamental. Isaac Newton and his contemporary Christiaan Huygens argued the toss over it back in the 17th century while Newton was writing his Principia Mathematica, which sets out many of the laws of physics. Newton thought that an object’s speed through a fluid would depend on its viscosity, whereas Huygens thought it would not. In the end, Newton included both versions in his text.

Hamstrung by their lack of access to guar gum or competitive swimmers, Newton’s and Huygens’ work was mainly theoretical. Cussler’s demonstration shows that Huygens was right, at least for human-sized projectiles.

The reason, explains Cussler, is that while you experience more “viscous drag” (basically friction from your movement through the fluid) as the water gets thicker, you generate more forwards force from every stroke. The two effects cancel each other out.

That’s not always the case. Below a certain threshold of speed and size, viscous drag becomes the dominant force, making gloopy fluids are more difficult to swim through. Had Cussler done his experiment on swimming bacteria instead of humans, he would have recorded much slower times in syrup than in water.

But for humans, speed depends not on what you swim in, but on what shape you are. Once the effects on thrust and friction have been cancelled out, the predominant force that remains is ‘form drag’. This is due to the frontal area presented by a body – try running with a large newspaper held in front of you and see how much more difficult it is.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Quotes from linked articles are probably the property of the publications linked or the property of the person(s) quoted. The rest © 2001- 2026 by James A. Chappell