I’ve always argued that the demonization of Judas never really made sense. Without Judas (or another “betrayer”), Christianity would not be possible. Looks like someone from around 300 AD agrees with me.
And now, for something completely different
I’ve always argued that the demonization of Judas never really made sense. Without Judas (or another “betrayer”), Christianity would not be possible. Looks like someone from around 300 AD agrees with me.